Re: Polish ASCII

From: Janusz S. Bień (jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 01:26:06 EST

Previous message: $B$m!;!;!;!;(B $B$m!;!;!;(B: "Guys, guys, why is this "oo-with-breve" thread going on for so long?"
In reply to: Martin Kochanski: "Re: Polish ASCII"
Next in thread: R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein]: "Re: Polish ASCII"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 Martin Kochanski <unicode@cardbox.net> wrote:

[...]

> What I am asking is - what *was* the exact coding used? Whatever
> variations it may have started with, convergent evolution rapidly
> took over and there was, in the end, only one coding that everyone
> used and understood. It certainly wasn't the same as the example I
> gave.

You are misinformed. There was never a single generally accepted
representation of Polish letters in ASCII.

Regards

Janusz S. Bień

-- 
                     ,   
dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW
Prof. Janusz S. Bien, Warsaw Uniwersity
http://www.orient.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Na tym koncie czytam i wysylam poczte i wiadomosci offline.
On this account I read/post mail/news offline.

Previous message: $B$m!;!;!;!;(B $B$m!;!;!;(B: "Guys, guys, why is this "oo-with-breve" thread going on for so long?"
In reply to: Martin Kochanski: "Re: Polish ASCII"
Next in thread: R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein]: "Re: Polish ASCII"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Mar 06 2002 - 01:19:18 EST