On 03/08/2002 05:09:46 AM Michael Everson wrote:
>At 15:36 -0600 07/03/2002, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:
>
>>I may be wrong, but I believe that example has < ra, halant, ra,
>>independent i >. The first ra is the one that transforms into the reph.
>
>You're wrong. RI in this case is a way of writing the vocalic r.
>Compare Kr.s.n.a and Krishna.
I guess that's what I get for comment on things beyond my ken. Mea culpa.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Mar 08 2002 - 11:49:17 EST