On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 09:47:50PM -0800, Doug Ewell wrote:
> You do realize, of course, that any sort of work done with Old Persian
> Cuneiform based on N1639 should be limited to laboratory
> experimentation. Not only is this script not in Unicode, it's been
> relegated to the "under investigation" list, a pool of quicksand from
> which few scripts have ever been rescued.
I've have a question, as much for Michael Everson as anyone else. How do
you rescue a script that has a proposal but hasn't had any action in 5
years? One of my friends was asking about Hungarian Runic, and all I
could suggest was getting the Hungarian standards body to take up the
cause.
-- David Starner - starner@okstate.edu "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably refering to the Internet)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Mar 13 2002 - 13:54:31 EST