Those are good...except for
> Or: "One font can handle all of Unicode"
should be: "I need a single font with all Unicode characters so that I can
handle all of Unicode"
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: <Martin_Hosken@sil.org>
To: <mark.davis@jtcsv.com>
Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>; <unicore@unicode.org>;
<unicore-bounce@unicode.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 20:13
Subject: Re: More Unicode Myths?
>
>
>
> Dear Mark,
>
> >I am going to be updating my slides on "Unicode Myths" for a presentation
> in April. If anyone has any additional myths (common misinformation about
> Unicode), I'd appreciate suggestions.
>
> How about: Unicode messed up the encoding of <insert favourite, probably
> indic, script here> because I don't see how to implement it with current
> technology.
> Or: "I don't need to know what language of the text I am processing is.
One
> algorithm fits all"
>
> Or: "One font can handle all of Unicode"
>
> Or: "The Unicode Consortium is a monolithic top down organisation that
> doesn't need my help/input"
>
> I don't know how many of these are common and are worth including.
>
> Martin Hosken
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Mar 14 2002 - 10:30:10 EST