On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 03:28 , Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Nothing fancy, just spell-checked and pod-checked the documents.
>
> Also, shouldn't EncodeFormat.pod be renamed to Encode/Format.pod for
> consistency's sake?
I was about to do the rename and thanks for the patch. but the patch
for Encode.pm fails at Hunk #6.
I even tried a fresh copy of Encode-0.97 and Encode-0.96 and still get
the same result. Would you please send me a whole file, Encode.pm to
make sure? URI is the most welcome but mime attachment is okay.
Dan the Encode Maitainer
> > patch < ../Encode/autrijius.patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |diff -durN lib.old/Encode/Details.pod lib/Encode/Details.pod
> |--- lib.old/Encode/Details.pod Sun Mar 24 13:22:06 2002
> |+++ lib/Encode/Details.pod Sun Mar 24 13:43:14 2002
> --------------------------
> Patching file lib/Encode/Details.pod using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 14.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 87.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 260.
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 407.
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 496 with fuzz 1.
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 613.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 627.
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 803.
> Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |diff -durN lib.old/Encode/Supported.pod lib/Encode/Supported.pod
> |--- lib.old/Encode/Supported.pod Sun Mar 24 13:22:06 2002
> |+++ lib/Encode/Supported.pod Sun Mar 24 13:29:35 2002
> --------------------------
> Patching file lib/Encode/Supported.pod using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 24.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 102.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 173.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 209.
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 235.
> Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |--- Encode.pm.bak Sun Mar 24 04:24:42 2002
> |+++ Encode.pm Sun Mar 24 13:43:47 2002
> --------------------------
> Patching file Encode.pm using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 234.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 242.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 252.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 262.
> Hunk #5 failed at 336.
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 381.
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 401.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 481.
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 495 with fuzz 2.
> 1 out of 9 hunks failed--saving rejects to Encode.pm.rej
> done
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Mar 24 2002 - 03:51:40 EST