At 12:54 5/31/2002, John Cowan wrote:
>I rather like the Microsoft approach of assigning them [ornaments] to the
>F000-F0FF, which sort of preserves the pseudo-ASCII nature of them without
>interfering with semantic text processing that assigns ASCII semantics to
>the 0000-00FF codepoints.
I don't see the value in preserving the pseudo-ASCII ordering if you're
giving up the easy keyboard access and, of course, any measure of backwards
compatibility with the 8-bit versions of the fonts. As I said, whatever we
come up with is going to be arbitrary and, in terms of text processing, a
kludge. So the question is really, what is the most useful kludge?
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC firstname.lastname@example.org
When the pages of books fall in fiery scraps
Onto smashed leaves and twisted metal,
The tree of good and evil is stripped bare.
- Czeslaw Milosz
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri May 31 2002 - 14:44:56 EDT