Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Aug 13 2002 - 11:29:47 EDT

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Furigana"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units"
Next in thread: Andrew C. West: "Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 13:58 -0700 2002-08-08, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>
>Characters like the BISMALLAH ARRAHMAN ARRAHIM that meet obvious
>local requirements and make implementation sense are acceptable
>to the UTC.

Note that the Maldivians asked for the same "entity" for the same
reasons the Pakistanis did but it was rejected because it had a
decomposition.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Furigana"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units"
Next in thread: Andrew C. West: "Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Aug 13 2002 - 14:57:11 EDT