William Overington scripsit:
> As first letter and second letter could be theoretically almost any other
> Unicode characters, would the approach be to just place all three glyphs
> superimposed onto the screen and hope that the visual effect is reasonable
> or would a font have a special glyph within it for each of the permutations
> of three characters which the font designer thought might reasonably occur
> yet default to a superimposing of three glyphs for any unexpected
> permutation which arises?
Depending on font support, there could be a glyph for this combination,
or the default could be used, which is that the combining mark is positioned
over the first character in such a way that it hangs over the presumed
space for the next character (hopefully more or less correctly).
-- Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x) Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun" jcowan@reutershealth.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Aug 14 2002 - 09:16:51 EDT