RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 12:58:58 EDT

Previous message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
In reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:03 -0400 2002-08-30, <jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com> wrote:
> > And who pays the poor font designer for his work?
>
>U+0041 U+006C U+0074 U+0072 U+0075 U+0069 U+0073 U+006D U+0020
>U+006F U+0072 U+0020 U+006B U+0075 U+0064 U+006F U+0073 U+002C
>U+0020 U+006D U+0061 U+0079 U+0062 U+0065 U+003F

"Altruism or kudos, maybe?"

Kudos do not pay the rent. And altruism can run out when the rent
needs to be paid.... ;-)

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
In reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 30 2002 - 13:50:28 EDT