Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 14:09:44 EDT

Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
In reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

What scares me was that I puzzled that out almost instantly -- I felt like I
was watching Wheel of Fortune or something. ;-)

MichKa

----- Original Message -----
From: <jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com>
To: <everson@evertype.com>; <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)

> > And who pays the poor font designer for his work?
>
> U+0041 U+006C U+0074 U+0072 U+0075 U+0069 U+0073 U+006D U+0020 U+006F
U+0072 U+0020 U+006B U+0075 U+0064 U+006F U+0073 U+002C U+0020 U+006D U+0061
U+0079 U+0062 U+0065 U+003F
>
>
>

Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
In reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 30 2002 - 14:50:28 EDT