Re: Header Reply-To

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 17:36:31 EST

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: ct, fj and blackletter ligatures"

Previous message: Tex Texin: "Re: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Reply: David Starner: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
To: "Thomas Lotze" <thomas.lotze@uni-jena.de>
Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Header Reply-To

> For an argument on the don't-add-Reply-To
> side, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html (no connection
> between unicom and unicode).

Why doesn't that page follow the ASCII standard and/or any ASCII-based
standard?

Stefan

_____________________________________________________
Följ VM på nära håll på Yahoo!s officielle VM-sajt www.yahoo.se/vm2002
Håll dig ajour med nyheter och resultat, med vinnare och förlorare...

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: ct, fj and blackletter ligatures"
Previous message: Tex Texin: "Re: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Reply: David Starner: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 18:12:33 EST