Re: Header Reply-To

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 20:08:45 EST

  • Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Starner" <starner@okstate.edu>
    To: "Stefan Persson" <alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se>
    Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 12:34 AM
    Subject: Re: Header Reply-To

    > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:36:31PM +0100, Stefan Persson wrote:
    > > > For an argument on the don't-add-Reply-To
    > > > side, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html (no
    connection
    > > > between unicom and unicode).
    > >
    > > Why doesn't that page follow the ASCII standard and/or any ASCII-based
    > > standard?
    >
    > What? As far as I can tell, it's 100% ASCII.

    It doesn't follow the ASCII standard as far as quotation marks are
    concerned.

    Stefan

    _____________________________________________________
    Gratis e-mail resten av livet på www.yahoo.se/mail
    Busenkelt!

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 20:42:21 EST