From: Simon Josefsson (simon+unicode@josefsson.org)
Date: Fri Nov 22 2002 - 11:53:50 EST
Marco Cimarosti <marco.cimarosti@essetre.it> writes:
> UTF-Morse - "Bringing Unicode in the telegraph age!"
...
> U+0041 ..-- .- LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A [2]
> U+0042 ..-- -... LATIN CAPITAL LETTER B [2]
> U+0043 ..-- -.-. LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C [2]
> U+0044 ..-- -.. LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D [2]
> U+0045 ..-- . LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E [2]
> U+0046 ..-- ..-. LATIN CAPITAL LETTER F [2]
> U+0047 ..-- --. LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G [2]
Interestingly, there is a Japanese morse language that conflicts with
these allocation:
http://www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~a1c/CW_J.htm (SJIS encoded)
Perhaps it would be useful to have a morse language selection
indicator in UTF-Morse a'la the succesful ISO-2022-JP.
The problem could also be defered to higher level frameworks, such as
the flexible MIME framework:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-morse+japanese
This seems like a serious problem that could delay deployment of
UTF-Morse.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 22 2002 - 12:45:19 EST