From: Yung-Fong Tang (ftang@netscape.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 15:20:48 EST
Guess I am not the right peson to answer that. put it back to
unicode.org mailling list.
Let me ask you this way. Is this a rendering style issue? or is it a
different way to combine characers?
How you pronounce the following 3?
Is there different pronouncation between 1 and 3?
Is there different pronouncation between 2 and 3?
The answer of the two questions above may tell us it is a encoding issue
or a presentation (glyph variant) issue.
> This is a unique spelling that is commonly found in the Quran.
Is that spelling also found in text OTHER than the Quran?
Mete Kural wrote:
>Hello Yung-Fong,
>
>Thank you very much for all the information. It was
>very helpful. I'm still not clear about something
>though. As far as I understand, the block of
>characters
>U+0644-U+0654-U+0627 would be rendered as such:
>
> c
> \ /
> \/
> /\
> \/
>
>U+0644-U+0627-U+0654 would be rendered:
>
>c
> \ /
> \/
> /\
> \/
>
>So how would you encode this rendering?
>
> c
> \ /
> \/
> /\
> \/
>
>in which the hamza is neither directly above the alef,
>nor directly above the lam, but it's in between the
>alef and lam. This is a unique spelling that is
>commonly found in the Quran.
>
>Thank you very much for the help.
>
>Mete
>
>--- Yung-Fong Tang <ftang@netscape.com> wrote:
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:04:57 EST