Re: (no subject)

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:48:00 EST

Next message: William Overington: "Displaying the languages of the Indian subcontinent. (derives from Re: Please see my latest proposal)"

Previous message: Mijan: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Mijan: "(no subject)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: (no subject)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: (no subject)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mijan scripsit:

> Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya is
> displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
> instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could also represents
> ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and have
> different meaning.

I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If correct, then
the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.

-- 
Dream projects long deferred            John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
usually bite the wax tadpole.            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --James Lileks                  http://www.reutershealth.com

Next message: William Overington: "Displaying the languages of the Indian subcontinent. (derives from Re: Please see my latest proposal)"
Previous message: Mijan: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Mijan: "(no subject)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: (no subject)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: (no subject)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 17:34:08 EST