Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)

From: Rick McGowan (rick@unicode.org)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:02:47 EST

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"

Previous message: Pim Blokland: "Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Maybe in reply to: Pim Blokland: "Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Next in thread: David Oftedal: "Re: FAQ entry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I mean, the dot is an
> accent mark, allowing the i to be decomposed into U+0131 and U+0307.

Not canonically. Anyway, the dot isn't an accent mark -- it has no effect
on pronunciation. [Skip lecture on origins of the dot...]

Rick

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Previous message: Pim Blokland: "Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Maybe in reply to: Pim Blokland: "Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Next in thread: David Oftedal: "Re: FAQ entry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:45:52 EST