Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop

From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:03:28 EST

Next message: Kevin Brown: "I-Ching Hexagrams"

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Can you respond back to them with the information as to the languages
involved?

Mark
(مرقص بن داود)
________
mark.davis@jtcsv.com
IBM, MS 50-2/B11, 5600 Cottle Rd, SJ CA 95193
(408) 256-3148
fax: (408) 256-0799

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 01:45
Subject: Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop

> I would have to disagree with these Indian experts in this instance.
> The Devanagari glottal stop does not have a dot, and indeed, in the
> languages which use it, this character will certainly coexist with
> the question mark. They have different shapes, and different
> functions.
> --
> Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
>
>

Next message: Kevin Brown: "I-Ching Hexagrams"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Devanagari Glottal Stop"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:43:12 EST