Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Mon Apr 07 2003 - 10:17:28 EDT

Next message: Edward C. D. Hopkins: "Ancient Greek (symbols versus letters and duplicate letters)"

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: UNICODE-non-clashing ASCII character needed"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Next in thread: Jim Allan: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kenneth Whistler wrote on 04/04/2003 05:53:36 PM:

> > Then you'd be even more surprised at c-ogonek. (IJAL 65, p. 331.)
>
> Used for what? Unless it is a dyslexic c-cedilla

Sorry, I guess I was the dyslexic: it was an open o that, in my haste,
registered in my mind as "c".

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485

Next message: Edward C. D. Hopkins: "Ancient Greek (symbols versus letters and duplicate letters)"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: UNICODE-non-clashing ASCII character needed"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Next in thread: Jim Allan: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 11:31:38 EDT