From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:42:23 EDT
Stefan Persson scripsit:
> Do the Chinese ideographs actually *have* names in Unicode?
They do, but not very useful ones. The names are of the form
CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-xxxx or CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-2xxxx, or the same
with COMPATIBILITY instead of UNIFIED.
-- Do what you will, John Cowan this Life's a Fiction jcowan@reutershealth.com And is made up of http://www.reutershealth.com Contradiction. --William Blake http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 10:24:56 EDT