From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 11:32:31 EDT
Michael Kaplan wrote on 04/13/2003 01:05:41 PM:
> While it is certainly possible for the PUA to be important for specific
> purposes, the needs are usually temporary, as compared to EUDC, which in
> most cases is never temporary. Thus for every one person cursing the
> implementation there are several dozen or more who are praising it.
But it should not be difficult to provide a UI so that users can control
whether the affected portion of the PUA should have EUDC-related semantics
or not.
> EUDC is not as "corporate" thing; it is characters defined by end users.
But the functionality is being provided by a vendor, not by end users.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:32:43 EDT