From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:18:43 EDT
At 15:43 -0700 2003-04-21, Paul Nelson \(TYPOGRAPHY\) wrote:
>Can you please help me understand the difference between the ARABIC
>MADDAH ABOVE (U+0653) and the proposed ZWARAKAY? It seems that they have
>the same functionality. The glyph shape is also very similar.
Not at all. Firstly, the shape of MADDAH is different, it has a tick
on the left and is bowed as it is written to the right. It indicates
[a:]. ZWARAKAY is used just as FATHA is, only it indicates [@] rather
than [a].
Yes, I will be uploading an R version with corrected images as soon
as possible.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 02:59:53 EDT