Re: More on Meteg and CGJ

From: Peter Kirk (peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:02:12 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"

    On 29/07/2003 13:10, Joan_Wardell@sil.org wrote:

    >[quoting John Hudson I think - PK]
    >
    > >shin < hataf < dagesh < shindot <new right meteg
    >
    Surely, if we allocate a sensible combining class to our new character
    based on its logical position, as we are presumably free to do, this
    would be normalised as:

    >shin < new right meteg < hataf < dagesh < shindot

    which would probably be less of a problem for the font. 

    -- 
Peter Kirk
peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com
http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:30:46 EDT