Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 16:58:47 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Hebrew Vav Holam"

    At 01:18 PM 7/31/2003, Ted Hopp wrote:

    >There are exactly two Hebrew vowels that are spacing glyphs: holam male and
    >shuruq. Neither one is encoded in Unicode. Neither one is a Hebrew letter
    >(in the traditional sense) nor is either a combining mark. I thought some
    >new nomenclature was in order. Since there are general category Lo code
    >points with names like LAO VOWEL SIGN AA [0EB0], I went with that. (Maybe I
    >shouldn't have dropped the "SIGN".)
    >
    >It seems wrong to be calling a base character a HEBREW MARK. It also seems a
    >little odd to be calling a Hebrew vowel a HEBREW LETTER when every other
    >HEBREW LETTER is a consonant. But if that's what convention requires....

    Weingreen, _A practical grammar for classical Hebrew_ (2nd ed., Oxford,
    1959, pp.6-7) records yod, vav and he sometimes being used for common vowel
    prior to the development of the point system, in addition to their usual
    consonantal role:

    he = short a
    yod = short e and short i
    vav = short u and short o

    Weingreen uses the term 'vowel-letters'.

    My Hebrew knowledge is nowhere near good enough to judge the accuracy of
    Weingreen's explanation nor terminology on this issue.

    John Hudson

    Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
    Vancouver, BC tiro@tiro.com

    The sight of James Cox from the BBC's World at One,
    interviewing Robin Oakley, CNN's man in Europe,
    surrounded by a scrum of furiously scribbling print
    journalists will stand for some time as the apogee of
    media cannibalism.
                             - Emma Brockes, at the EU summit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 17:34:13 EDT