Re: Unicode Normalisaton Optimisation Experiments

From: Markus Scherer (markus.scherer@jtcsv.com)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:40:02 EDT

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: About that alphabetician..."

Previous message: myrkraverk@users.sourceforge.net: "Internal Representation of Unicode"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Unicode Normalisaton Optimisation Experiments"
Next in thread: jon@spin.ie: "Re: Unicode Normalisaton Optimisation Experiments"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk wrote:
> On 25/09/2003 14:25, Markus Scherer wrote:
>> In other words, yes, Unicode's NFC does perform "discontiguous
>> composition". Some things might be easier if only contiguous
>> composition were used, but the current definition does give you the
>> shortest strings.
>
> And this current definition cannot be changed because of the stability
> policy, right?

Right.

markus

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: About that alphabetician..."
Previous message: myrkraverk@users.sourceforge.net: "Internal Representation of Unicode"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Unicode Normalisaton Optimisation Experiments"
Next in thread: jon@spin.ie: "Re: Unicode Normalisaton Optimisation Experiments"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 21:50:55 EDT