From: Christopher John Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 07:49:32 CST
> "Deepayan Sarkar" <deepayan@stat.wisc.edu> wrote:
> But this would not reflect the fact that the *glyph* [CONS][ZWJ][CONS] is
> actually the same thing as the *sequence of characters*
[CONS][VIRAMA][CONS],
> i.e., [CONS][VIRAMA][ZWNJ][CONS] is also a perfectly legitimate
> representation.
As I understand it, [CONS][VIRAMA][VIRAMA][CONS] is the correct way of
forcing a virama to be displayed rather than a ligature - not
[CONS][VIRAMA][ZWNJ][CONS]
- Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST