Re: Java char and Unicode 3.0+ (was:Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 13:18:26 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
In reply to: Rick McGowan: "Re: Java char and Unicode 3.0+ (was:Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Java char and Unicode 3.0+ (was:Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 11:07 -0700 2003-10-16, Rick McGowan wrote:
>John Cowan suggested:
>
>> The earth is finite and small, and there's no place for
>> large writing systems to hide from the eagle eyes of the Roadmappers.
>
>Central Asia.

Our eyes are everywhere.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
In reply to: Rick McGowan: "Re: Java char and Unicode 3.0+ (was:Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Java char and Unicode 3.0+ (was:Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST