RE: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+

From: Peter Constable ([email protected])
Date: Fri Oct 17 2003 - 03:13:27 CST

• Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?"
• Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
• Next in thread: Jill Ramonsky: "RE: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On
> Behalf Of Philippe Verdy

> or the extra
> PUAs needed by Microsoft in its OpenType fonts for Office...)

(sigh)

OpenType fonts are not for only Office. PUAs are not needed or used by
Microsoft for OpenType implementations -- for Office or anything else.
(They have been used by MS in *non-OT* solutions to various problems).

Peter
 
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

• Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?"
• Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
• Next in thread: Jill Ramonsky: "RE: Beyond 17 planes, was: Java char and Unicode 3.0+"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST