Re: PUA

From: Curtis Clark (jcclark@mockfont.com)
Date: Sun Oct 19 2003 - 22:06:16 CST

Next message: Patrick Andries: "[OT] Why is the Khmer om sign called om and not um ?"
Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: PUA"
In reply to: Chris Jacobs: "PUA"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: PUA"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 2003-10-19 19:34 Chris Jacobs wrote:

> One problem is that there seems to be no way in plaintext unicode to specify
> who is in charge of a particular interpretation of the PUA.

At last! Another use for Plane 14! :-)

-- 
Curtis Clark                  http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Mockingbird Font Works                  http://www.mockfont.com/

Next message: Patrick Andries: "[OT] Why is the Khmer om sign called om and not um ?"
Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: PUA"
In reply to: Chris Jacobs: "PUA"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: PUA"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST