Re[2]: GDP by language

From: Alexander Savenkov (savenkov@xmlhack.ru)
Date: Thu Oct 23 2003 - 05:50:32 CST

Next message: Magda Danish \(Unicode\): "FW: Web Form: Other Question, Problem, or Feedback"
Previous message: Owen Taylor: "Re: unicode on Linux"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: GDP by language"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: GDP by language"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hello everyone,

2003-10-22T21:53:44Z Peter Kirk <peterkirk@qaya.org> wrote:

...snip...
> The data doesn't support addition to this degree of accuracy because of
> the effect of the "others" area. Cyrillic may even overtake Arabic,
> because there are several countries using the Cyrillic alphabet, but not
> Russian or Ukrainian, which might each contribute 0.1-0.2%, but no
> countries as far as I know using Arabic script but not Arabic, Persian
> or Urdu as official languages (except perhaps Pashto in Afghanistan).

I know that Tajik is currently written and taught in Arabic script in
some schools. That's another one. There may be more.

Best regards,

-- 
  Alexander Savenkov                            http://www.xmlhack.ru/
  savenkov@xmlhack.ru             http://www.xmlhack.ru/authors/croll/

Next message: Magda Danish \(Unicode\): "FW: Web Form: Other Question, Problem, or Feedback"
Previous message: Owen Taylor: "Re: unicode on Linux"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: GDP by language"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: GDP by language"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST