From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Thu Oct 30 2003 - 18:45:57 CST
John Cowan wrote:
> > http://panda.com/tops-20/utf9.txt
> >
> > Res ipsa loquitur.
But apparently res ipsa non loquitur, because Phillipe continued:
>
> Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but nonets?
> i.e. 9-bit based platforms? If so this proposal makes sense, but as a local
> optimization for these platforms. ...
[5 paragraphs excised]
The most important line to note in the UTF-9 internet
draft is:
INTERNET DRAFT UTF-9 April 1, 2003
'nuff said.
--Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:25 CST