RE: Encoding Tamil SRI

From: Marco Cimarosti (marco.cimarosti@essetre.it)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 07:24:26 EST

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Jacobi: "Encoding Tamil SRI"
Next in thread: jameskass@att.net: "RE: Encoding Tamil SRI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Constable wrote:
> > Alternatives given were
> > (0BB8)(0BCD)(0BB1)(0BC0)
> > (0BB6)(0BCD)(0BB1)(0BC0) (if and when U+0BB6 becomes Unicode)
> > (0B9A)(0BBF)(0BB1)(0BC0)
>
> Alternatives to what? The first and third sequence would have distinct
> appearances (see attached file), and would consistute distinct
> spellings. The second cannot be evaluated without knowing what they
> intend 0BB6 to be.

U+0BB6 = TAMIL LETTER SHA (see
<http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html>).

_ Marco

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Jacobi: "Encoding Tamil SRI"
Next in thread: jameskass@att.net: "RE: Encoding Tamil SRI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 08:08:36 EST