From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Nov 07 2003 - 06:55:28 EST
At 14:58 +0000 2003-11-06, jameskass@att.net wrote:
> > Tamil SHRI [sic] can't be represented correctly in Unicode yet. It
>> will not be able to be correctly until U+0BB6 is encoded. It was
>> accepted for ballot by WG2 and UTC but has to go through the process
>> now.
>
>Proposal for adding SHA at U+0BB6 can be seen at:
>http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n2617
>
>In the document, it is noted that the current practice for encoding
>SHRI in Unicode is SA+VIRAMA+RA. Does this mean that existing
>documents/data are incorrect or will become incorrect once SHA is
>formally approved?
I think that it should. SHA is being disunified from SA in this instance.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 07 2003 - 07:47:36 EST