Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 14:25:58 EST

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Berber/Tifinagh (was: Swahili & Banthu)"

Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 11:20 -0800 2003-11-10, Peter Kirk wrote:

>>Who knows? You adduce no evidence.
>
>There is not much point in producing evidence if there are no agreed criteria.

OK.

>In the absence of criteria the suspicion remains that decisions e.g.
>not to encode Theban and Klingon are purely subjective.

OK.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Berber/Tifinagh (was: Swahili & Banthu)"
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 15:36:02 EST