RE: Hexadecimal digits?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 15:35:51 EST

  • Next message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"

    At 18:13 +0000 2003-11-11, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
    > > >This is another strawman argument isn't it? Nobody on this thread
    >> >has said they want monospaced alphanumerics.
    >>
    >> No, but the responsibles have responded
    >
    >My command of my native language (English) is pretty good, but the
    >above is so ungrammatical that I don't understand it at all.

    It isn't ungrammatical. It's really, really old-fashioned though. The
    means "those responsible".

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 11 2003 - 16:32:52 EST