Re: Ewellic

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Wed Nov 12 2003 - 17:58:00 EST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ewellic"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Stenography, was: Ewellic"
In reply to: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
Next in thread: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
Reply: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 12/11/2003 12:55, Jim Allan wrote:

> ...
>
> As far as I can see, for example, Unifon people favor an ASCII cipher
> encoding over the conscript registry coding of Unifon. An IPA-based
> cipher encoding might be better.
>
Many biblical Hebrew users still prefer one of many ASCII or ISO-8859-1
ciphers of Hebrew, complete with visual ordering, to the defined Unicode
script. Is that an argument for deprecating the script and recognising
the cipher?

-- 
Peter Kirk
peter@qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ewellic"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Stenography, was: Ewellic"
In reply to: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
Next in thread: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
Reply: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 18:54:42 EST