Re: Stenography, was: Ewellic

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Nov 12 2003 - 19:06:58 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Ewellic"

Previous message: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Stenography, was: Ewellic"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Ewellic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 15:04 -0800 2003-11-12, Peter Kirk wrote:

>Are the well-known systems of stenography or shorthand, e.g. Pitman,
>Gregg, considered suitable for encoding in Unicode?

In principle, they are. The font/ligature tables for them would be
pretty monstrous however in implementation.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Ewellic"
Previous message: Jim Allan: "Re: Ewellic"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Stenography, was: Ewellic"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Ewellic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 20:05:39 EST