Re: Normalisation stability, was: Compression through normalization

• Previous message: John Cowan: "The Chart"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Normalisation stability, was: Compression through normalization"
• Next in thread: Arcane Jill: "RE: Compression through normalization"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Of course, as usual, this is my opinion. UTC hasn't actually made any
proclamations about what will or won't be done in terms of the classes or
what kinds of classes might be assigned in the future.

        Rick

> John Cowan suggested...
>
> > We will never come close to exceeding this limit. Essentially all new
> > combining characters are either class 0 or fall into one of the 200-range
> > positional classes.
>
> Or 9, for viramas.
>
> One take-home point is that there won't be any more "fixed position"
> classes added for Hebrew or any other scripts.
>
> Rick

• Next message: jameskass@att.net: "RE: Request"
• Previous message: John Cowan: "The Chart"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Normalisation stability, was: Compression through normalization"
• Next in thread: Arcane Jill: "RE: Compression through normalization"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2003 - 16:41:29 EST