From: Patrick Andries (Patrick.Andries@xcential.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 23:18:22 EST
----- Message d'origine -----
De: "Christopher John Fynn" <cfynn@gmx.net>
> "Patrick Andries" <Patrick.Andries@xcential.com>
>
> > Well, some fonts would be better than none
> > (and they have to be made so that
> > the Unicode standard be printed).
>
> In the case of complex scripts, a font sufficient to print a code chart is
> nowhere near adequate to render that script properly.
>
> If you code chart type glyphs are enough for you then on Windows if you
have MS
> Office there is always Arial Unicode.
Which, of course, is not complete hence my question (maybe a foolish one as
someone seemed to say).
P. A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 03 2003 - 00:00:25 EST