Re: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?

• Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Korean compression (was: Re: Ternary search trees for Unicode dictionaries)"
• In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?"
• Next in thread: John Jenkins: "Re: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 18:35 -0800 2003-12-02, Patrick Andries wrote:

> > Fonts for some
>> scripts can take a long time to make properly,
>
>Well, some fonts would be better than none (and they have to be made so that
>the Unicode standard be printed).

I (for instance) provided Gothic and Linear B and Ogham and lots and
lots of other fonts to print the standard. You are not suggesting
that I (for instance) should *give* those fonts to Apple and Sun and
Microsoft and Linux and any and everyone else so that they can add
such excellent value to their operating systems, are you?

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

• Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?"
• Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Korean compression (was: Re: Ternary search trees for Unicode dictionaries)"
• In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?"
• Next in thread: John Jenkins: "Re: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 03 2003 - 06:43:13 EST