Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 20:01:12 EST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Stability of WG2 (was: Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC)"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Next in thread: Jungshik Shin: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Reply: Jungshik Shin: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:

> (although I do think the change from Korea to Corea is a bit stupid)

I still don't see what possible benefit could accrue to the Koreas by
changing the spelling of their English names. The main effect would be
confusion.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Stability of WG2 (was: Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC)"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Next in thread: Jungshik Shin: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Reply: Jungshik Shin: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 15 2003 - 20:37:38 EST