RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval

From: Elaine Keown (elaine_keown@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 15:10:25 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Reply: Michael Everson: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Reply: John Jenkins: "Re: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Elaine Keown

Hi,

I hesitate to ask this, but what is the current
opinion on how many Han characters there are?

There's some Canadian Taoist scholar who has a really
high number.....

All I know is that that 1740s dictionary had ~40,000.

Elaine

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/

Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Reply: Michael Everson: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Reply: John Jenkins: "Re: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 24 2003 - 15:47:17 EST