Re: why Aramaic now

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 15:45:37 EST

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: why Aramaic now"

    At 12:38 -0800 2003-12-24, Curtis Clark wrote:
    >on 2003-12-24 12:02 Elaine Keown wrote:
    >>Some of the sets of symbols I found---which I simply
    >>assumed could be added to "Hebrew"--are innately
    >>controversial because of the Roadmap.
    >
    >I've been following these threads with interest, as an uninformed
    >bystander. Michael's unwillingness to unify in haste seems correct
    >in first principles, independent of his expertise and experience.
    >But you have presented the first cogent (to me :-) argument for why
    >delaying the decision is a problem.

    Not at all. Punctuation marks are often shared between scripts.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 24 2003 - 16:28:24 EST