Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ? (was: Pre-1923 characters?)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:37:02 EST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Pre-1923 characters?"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ? (was: Pre-1923 characters?)"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ? (was: Pre-1923 characters?)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 23:23 +0100 2004-01-03, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
> > The glyphs are not normative.
>
>But if you want to insist more with your position, why not simply dropping
>completely all glyphs from the Unicode standard?

Because they are informative.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Pre-1923 characters?"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ? (was: Pre-1923 characters?)"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ? (was: Pre-1923 characters?)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 18:02:28 EST