Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 17:49:59 EST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Pre-1923 characters? (was: unicode Digest V4 #3)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: U+0185 in Zhuang and Azeri (was Re: unicode Digest V4 #3)"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 14:37 -0800 2004-01-05, Peter Kirk wrote:

>As you will see, I have requested precisely this clarification for
>U+0184/0185, to clarify that this letter is used in pan-Turkic
>alphabets as well as in Zhuang. I am also asking for a change in the
>reference glyph for U+0185, because in both Zhuang and pan-Turkic
>this should be much shorter, and distinguished from "b" primarily by
>its size.

In Pan-Turkic, though, it looks just like CYRILLIC SOFT SIGN in all
the sources I have seen. For lots of languages.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Pre-1923 characters? (was: unicode Digest V4 #3)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: U+0185 in Zhuang and Azeri (was Re: unicode Digest V4 #3)"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 18:35:00 EST