Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 19:10:29 EST

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Pre-1923 characters? (was: unicode Digest V4 #3)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter said:

> As you will see, I have requested precisely this clarification for
> U+0184/0185, to clarify that this letter is used in pan-Turkic alphabets
> as well as in Zhuang. I am also asking for a change in the reference
> glyph for U+0185, because in both Zhuang and pan-Turkic this should be
> much shorter, and distinguished from "b" primarily by its size.

TBD. I will answer this on the separate (more appropriately
titled) thread which has developed on this.

--Ken

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Pre-1923 characters? (was: unicode Digest V4 #3)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 19:42:33 EST