Re: doubt

• Previous message: Christopher Cullen: "Re: Chinese rod numerals"
• In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: doubt"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "[OT] ASCII support in C/C++ (was: doubt)"
• Reply: Philippe Verdy: "[OT] ASCII support in C/C++ (was: doubt)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Philippe Verdy scripsit:

[much useful stuff snipped]

> A source-code symbolic character literal like 'A' is not guaranteed to
> compile (but it's unlikely that there's no character LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
> in the runtime charset), so be careful with some characters like '[' which
> may not exist in all ISO-646 compatible run-time charsets.

There is a concept of the minimal runtime charset: it must include the
ASCII letters and digits and some others.

-- 
Principles.  You can't say A is         John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
made of B or vice versa.  All mass      http://www.reutershealth.com
is interaction.  --Richard Feynman      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• Next message: Doug Ewell: "[OT] Legacy encodings (was: Re: Chinese rod numerals)"
• Previous message: Christopher Cullen: "Re: Chinese rod numerals"
• In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: doubt"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "[OT] ASCII support in C/C++ (was: doubt)"
• Reply: Philippe Verdy: "[OT] ASCII support in C/C++ (was: doubt)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 10 2004 - 14:12:40 EST