Re: Klingon

From: John Cowan (cowan@mercury.ccil.org)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 07:06:37 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Samaritan shan"

Previous message: Chris Jacobs: "Re: Determine the Code Page of a UniChar"
In reply to: Chris Jacobs: "Klingon"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Klingon"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Chris Jacobs scripsit:

> > I had a problem with this too, for a while (previous discussion on this
> > list helped clear it up). Klingon letters had been placed in the PUA by
> > the CSUR (ConsScript Unicode Registry, an unofficial allocation of PUA
> > space to constructed alphabets),
>
> Really?
>
> And did the Klingon Language Institute endorse that?

Absolutely. Note Mark's posting address, mark@kli.org. In this matter,
the Linux kernel team (who made the assignments in the first place),
the CSUR (namely Michael Everson and me), and the KLI speak as one.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Big as a house, much bigger than a house, it looked to [Sam], a grey-clad
moving hill.  Fear and wonder, maybe, enlarged him in the hobbit's eyes,
but the Mumak of Harad was indeed a beast of vast bulk, and the like of him
does not walk now in Middle-earth; his kin that live still in latter days are
but memories of his girth and his majesty.  --"Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit"

Next message: Michael Everson: "Samaritan shan"
Previous message: Chris Jacobs: "Re: Determine the Code Page of a UniChar"
In reply to: Chris Jacobs: "Klingon"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Klingon"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 07:46:01 EST