Re: Klingon

From: Chris Jacobs (chris.jacobs@freeler.nl)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 12:27:48 EST

Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Klingon"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Klingon"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Klingon"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Klingon"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Klingon"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> > WHY THEN DISTRIBUTES THE KLI SUCH A BLATANTLY UNCONFORMANT FONT?
>
> You could have said that without vociferating so loudly. (Against the
> etiquette, no?)

In the KLIpIqaDmey font this indicates using the pIqaD letters. Lower case
are the Mandel letters.

> What is non conforming? The fact that the font uses PUAs?

Rather the fact that it does not.

Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Klingon"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Klingon"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Klingon"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Klingon"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Klingon"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 13:22:09 EST