Re: Unwanted publicity?

From: rajesh chandrakar (rajesh@inflibnet.ac.in)
Date: Thu Jan 29 2004 - 00:08:09 EST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Unwanted publicity?"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Timothy Partridge" <timpart@perdix.demon.co.uk>
    To: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:45 AM
    Subject: Unwanted publicity?

    > I was somewhat surprised to see the word Unicode on page 8 of the Metro
    > newspaper (London, UK) today (January 28, 2004).
    >
    > Unfortunately it was in the middle of an article about Mydoom, where it
    says
    > "The message may read 'The message contains Unicode characters and has
    been
    > sent as a binary attachment.'" This was the only one of

    I think the sentence "The message contains Unicode characters and has been
    sent as a binary attachement" is a virus file comes as an attachement in
    subject area saying "hi". I got this kind of mail twice was containing
    virus. But I don't know about the newspaper how it has come.

    Rajesh

    the possible
    > messages they quoted, presumably because it was the most distinctive.
    >
    > The name Unicode is now in mailboxes around the world - is this a good or
    > bad thing?
    >
    > Tim
    >
    > --
    > Tim Partridge. Any opinions expressed are mine only and not those of my
    employer
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 29 2004 - 02:04:38 EST