Re: For Phoenician

From: jameskass@att.net
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 14:17:35 CST

• Next message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: New contribution"
• Previous message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CJK(B) and IE6"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "For Phoenician"
• Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "RE: For Phoenician"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk wrote,

>
> This pedagogical usage is not in plain text, or at least plain text
> usage has not been demonstrated. I think I asked before and didn't
> receive an answer: should Unicode encode a script whose ONLY
> demonstrated usage is in alphabet charts? I think the answer is not,
> because essentially these charts are graphics of glyphs, not text.
>

I wonder where the folks who made those charts got those glyphs?

Best regards,

James Kass
 

• Next message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: New contribution"
• Previous message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CJK(B) and IE6"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "For Phoenician"
• Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "RE: For Phoenician"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT